Monday, July 25, 2016

HEALTH CARE: Part 2

 A slightly edited version of this was printed in LP News Dec. 2013.




The problems with the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare as it is known in the media are all too obvious. Sadly over the last 150 years of regulations most of the problems start with regulations passed at the state level of government and not at the national level.  If anything the government should have worked at reducing and repealing the regulations passed by the states instead of beginning with a top down approach. To that end we suggest these steps as a beginning for reform.
Let’s be clear the Libertarian People supports a free and open market in health care and believes that you should have the right to choose the type of care you want whether it is traditional Asian, Western medical care or another variation.

Repeal the Occupational Licensing Laws. These laws do not protect patients but are there to protect the profession from competition. Occupational Licensing Laws and other regulations have deprived midwives, denturists, optometrists and others of an opportunity to practice and they deprive patients of a choice. Historically occupational licensing laws can be traced back to the Hammurabi Code of 1700 B.C. In the U.S. occupational licensing laws were used to keep newly freed slaves from competing against whites after the Civil War.

Sixteen states allow for Advance Nurse Practitioners to set up their own practices independent of doctors. In the others they are required to be supervised by an MD. Expanding the role that Advance Nurse Practitioners are allowed play will save many more tax dollars. Let’s repeal the laws in the states that restrict Advance Nurse Practitioners and give the public a few more choices. [1]

Nurse midwives are recognized in all states but direct entry midwives, which are those who did not study nursing, are prohibited from practicing in many states.  Direct entry midwives may have learned this craft through an apprenticeship or by attending a college that trains people for this occupation. Approximately twenty-six states have some form of laws permitting direct entry midwives. In the other states direct entry midwives are outlawed thus depriving mothers of a choice. [2] Midwives deliver about eight percent of births in the nation. [3] Studies have shown midwives to be as safe as doctors and offer mothers and infants care that is as good and sometimes better.[4]Such a change would be especially beneficial to Native Americans and African-Americans who have some of the highest rate of infant mortality due to lack of prenatal care. Child birth in the U.S. costs about $8000 and up [5] for an MD to deliver but $2500 to $4000 for a Midwife and often lower.  With forty percent of births nationally being paid for by Medicaid and 50% in Washington State expanding the opportunities for midwives would save significant tax dollars and result in healthier children at birth.

Abolish the state medical boards. In the fifty states the state medical boards are controlled by the professions and are a classic example of what is known as regulatory capture where the board is run for the benefit of the profession and not the patients. If the idea of equality before the law means anything then no profession should be treated any different than the general population.  [6]

Repeal the Certificate of Need Laws on the books in many states. These are laws were originally intended to reduce alternatives to established services, but do little more than increase the costs and deprive patients of another choice. With this law those who want to open a new hospital or another facility need to prove that there is need. [7]

Repeal the Corporate Practice of Medicine of Laws, regulations and court decisions. These laws and related court decisions were used by the medical profession to fight the growth of prepaid medical groups in the late 1940s and later years. Today the laws may be preventing the growth of retail health clinics in some states. Retail health clinics offer a viable low cost alternative to people needing immediate care instead of running to an expensive emergency room. Retail health clinics have grown significantly since 2006 when there were about 200 nationwide, today there are about 1300 nationwide. [8]

Abolish the FDA. There is no reason that the functions performed by the FDFA could not be done by a private organization such as Consumer Union or Underwriters Laboratory quicker and with better results for consumers and do away with the need for a prescription. If nothing else we should let pharmacists prescribe medicine as they did prior to 1938. [9]

Adopt No Fault medical malpractice Insurance.  With $250 billion spent on medical malpractice business and about 200,000 deaths annually [10] from medical errors and infections most of which are never compensated we need to find a way to fix this system and a no fault system may be a practical approach. [11]

Repeal the McCarran-Ferguson Act. This law passed in 1945 restricts the insurance companies from selling across state lines and has balkanized the insurance industry to the disadvantage of consumers. [12]

[11] I am not sure how no fault medical malpractice insurance fits into the libertarian mold because people should never be denied an opportunity to take the case to a jury.

Friday, July 15, 2016

Transportation: A bit of history



Transportation: A bit of history in Washington State.

Light rail has become the nation’s big answer to urban transit. However, given the rapid advances in technology it will be a big questionable expense.

Here are some of the laws on transportation. I've been reading through them and have made a note beside two of them. Certainly someone with more skill at reading legalize than me needs to take on that chore.
35.58.240
35.58.250 Repeal or reform to allow for competition
36.57A.100 Repeal or reform to allow for competition
36.57A.090
81.68.015
81.68.020
81.68.040
Here's some information on what has been called the best transit system worldwide a couple of time. We can't build it but it gives you an idea what can be done and it is made up of 16 private companies and possibly a bit more from time to time. http://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/fellows/brazil1203/transportation.html

Seattle history "The February 6th 1915 issue of the Electric Railway Journal reported that 518 Seattle jitney buses “are carrying 49,000 passengers daily…”
This piece below is from an older brochure I wrote up a few years ago. It is a bit out of date but the idea is still good.

“The Libertarian Party supports a free and open market in urban transportation services.
A Brief History: The transit industry is one of the most heavily regulated in the nation. In many cities it is almost impossible for you to own a transportation business because of the rules. The first major laws were passed to keep the jitneys from competing with the streetcars when jitney began to appear on the streets about 1915. Streetcars had been in decline for a number of years when in 1935 Congress passed the Public Utilities Holding Act that required the streetcar companies to be sold off from the electric companies that owned them. This led to the collapse of the streetcar business. In 1964 Congress passed the laws that spurred the development of government owned local transit companies

Transportation Alternatives: In 1986 London, England began to contract out their transit. By 1999 about 30 companies were providing bus transit in London. Services improved, costs were reduced significantly and ridership increased. Helsinki, Finland: Fourteen private companies now operate much of the region’s bus service through competitive bidding. A 30 % reduction in operating costs and a saving in subsidies has been achieved. Fares have been reduced by 12 % and services expanded. Stockholm, Sweden: In 1993 Stockholm began using private contractors to run their bus and rail system. Savings of nearly $150 million annually and reduced subsidies have been two improvements along with increased farebox revenue and more riders. Approximately 70% of the regions bus service has been contracted out. Copenhagen, Denmark: Similar results have been seen in Copenhagen where contracting out has been mandated by the Danish parliament. Source: http://www.apta.com/services/intnatl/intfocus/scandin.cfm Curitiba, Brazil: This transit system has been called one of the world’s best systems. With neighborhood circulators, intermediate services and express buses, all color coded, run by 16 private companies and overseen by a government agency this unsubsidized system is being copied by cities in other countries. With approximately 75% of the region’s 2.3 million daily commuters using the system Curitiba sets an example of what can be done to build a modern effective service for a fraction of the cost when there is a willingness to innovate. Source: http://www.worldbank.org/transport/urbtrans/pub_tr/curitiba_summary.pdf
The Jitneys in America: What’s a Jitney? First seen on the streets of Los Angeles about 1915 when automobiles began to appear, these privately owned vehicles competed with the streetcars for passengers. More flexible than streetcars and often operated part-time by drivers on their way to work they threatened the streetcars’ very existence. By the mid 1920s they had been outlawed in most American cities. The streetcar companies used their influence to kill off this emerging business. Today jitneys exist in only a few cites. The Atlantic City, New Jersey, jitney business is the oldest privately operated, unsubsidized transit operation in America. With 180 thirteen passenger vehicles running 24 hours a day 365 days a year and fares comparable to any bus system they offer riders a quality of service seldom seen anywhere.

Who Benefits from expanding transit services by opening the marketplace?
“Almost half those without an automobile are persons 65 years or older, and of these, 81% are women.”
“...23% of full-time working mothers and almost 60% of part-time working mothers have non-traditional work hours. This reduces women’s ability to join carpools or find appropriately-scheduled transit options.”
“...nearly 40% of central city African-American households were without access to an automobile, compared to fewer than one of out five white central city households.” Source: Using Public Transportation to Reduce the Economic, Social, and Human Costs of personal Immobility National Academy Press
In the 1930 the average family spent about 8% of family income on transit. In recent years the costs have climbed dramatically.

While ride sharing apps have benefitted many people not much has been done to help low income people improve their situation. Simply opening the marketplace may be the best way to help the poor and give them opportunities to start new businesses while helping others.”

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Government Waste in Washington State



By 2050 it is expected this society will have an economic problem because of the increase in the percentage of people over 65 from today's 15% to 30% nationally.  Some project that in Washington State the increase will only be to 20%. This demographic shift, call it a tidal wave, will likely require an increase in government support services for the elderly. Those services include healthcare under Medicaid, transportation, and housing.

To deal with that there are not many options; increase taxes to provide for those services, turn to the public sector for those services, or some combination of the first two.

I believe that it would be to the Libertarian movement’s benefit if it was pointed out that by reducing a number of programs, including departments, such as DNR, L & I, OSPI and a number of others tax dollar can be saved and used if need be for other services, especially for the elderly in need. To be clear DNR is the Department of Natural resources, L & I is Labor and Industries and OSPI is the Office of Superintendent of Public Instructions.

But let’s not stop with OSPI. The entire education system needs to be turned upside down and shaken. Every school district across the state should have their district office closed and sold off. Too much money is spent on these little fiefdoms that should go back to the taxpayer. Education should be separated from the state and run by teachers with the children learning what they wish when they wish.

Washington has about 195 departments and commissions some of which are necessary but probably a number of them could be abolished with the taxes returned to the public without anyone being harmed. Do we really need a Potato Commission or how about the Arts Commission? Then there are all of the boards that support the occupational licensing business which I really have to question because they really do little to protect the public. They do limit completion which drives up the prices and benefits the industry being licensed.

Given the present atmosphere we may even want to look at issues related to justice, crime and punishment. Are there better ways to deal with these issues in our state or the nation is a question we all should be asking ourselves and each other.

We need to prepare today for tomorrow’s problems.